Finance & Capital Market

Middle East war disrupts global economic growth, says IMF

WASHINGTON
Middle East war disrupts global economic growth, says IMF

After withstanding higher trade barriers and elevated uncertainty last year, global activity now faces a major test from the outbreak of war in the Middle East, which threatens to disrupt growth, says the latest World Economic Outlook report from IMF.

Assuming that the conflict remains limited in duration and scope, global growth is projected to be 3.1 percent in 2026 and 3.2 percent in 2027, slower than its recent pace of about 3.4 percent in 2024–25, and to settle at about that rate in the medium term, slower than its historical (2000–19) average of 3.7 percent. 

The forecast for 2026 is revised downward by 0.2 percentage point and that for 2027 is unchanged, compared with those in the January 2026 WEO Update. 

Global headline inflation is expected to increase to 4.4 percent in 2026 and decline to 3.7 percent in 2027, marking upward revisions for both years. 

Absent the war, global growth would have been revised upward. Indeed, forecasts based on pre-conflict assumptions would have shown a slight upward revision of 2026 growth relative to that forecasted in the January WEO Update, by 0.1 percentage point to 3.4 percent. Hence, the downward revision for 2026 largely reflects the disruptions from the conflict in the Middle East, partly offset by carryover from recent strong data and reduced tariff rates. 

Downside risks dominate the outlook. A longer or broader conflict, worsening geopolitical fragmentation, a reassessment of expectations surrounding artificial‑intelligence‑driven productivity, or renewed trade tensions could significantly weaken growth and destabilize financial markets. Elevated public debt and eroding institutional credibility further heighten vulnerabilities. At the same time, activity could be lifted if productivity gains from AI materialize more rapidly or trade tensions ease on a sustained basis. 

Fostering adaptability, maintaining credible policy frameworks, and reinforcing international cooperation are essential to navigating the current shock while preparing for future disruptions in an increasingly uncertain global environment. 

War a counterforce to tailwinds

Over the past year, headwinds from higher trade barriers and elevated uncertainty have been offset by tailwinds from technology-related investment; accommodative financial conditions, including a weaker US dollar; and fiscal and monetary policy support. 

The Middle East conflict presents a significant counterforce to these tailwinds through its impact on commodity markets, inflation expectations, and financial conditions. 

Given the difficulty of underpinning in real time a consistent set of assumptions for projections, this World Economic Outlook (WEO) report presents a “reference forecast” — in lieu of the traditional baseline —predicated on the assumption that the war will have limited duration, intensity, and scope, such that the disruptions will fade by mid-2026, consistent with commodity futures prices as of March 10, it said. 

However, given the fluidity of the situation, the report complements the global reference forecast with scenarios in which the conflict lasts longer or expands. 

Toll on conflict region high

Crucially, there is a high degree of cross-country dispersion in the reference forecast. While the growth and inflation revisions seem relatively modest at the global level, the toll on the conflict region and more vulnerable economies elsewhere — in particular, commodity-importing emerging market and developing economies with preexisting fragilities — is much more pronounced. 

The downward revision to growth in emerging market and developing economies is 0.3 percentage point for 2026, relative to that in the January WEO Update, while the forecast is broadly unchanged for advanced economies.   

Under an adverse scenario with larger and more persistent increases in energy prices, global growth would slow further to 2.5 percent in 2026, and inflation would reach 5.4 percent. Under a more severe scenario in which there is more damage to energy infrastructure in the conflict region, the impact would be even larger: Global growth would be cut to only about 2 percent in 2026, while headline inflation would be just above 6 percent by 2027. The impact on emerging market and developing economies would be almost twice that on advanced economies.  

Downside risks dominate, even after the realisation of a risk event—namely, an escalation of geopolitical tensions—frequently underscored in previous WEO reports. Geopolitical tensions could worsen even more than they already have — turning the situation into the largest energy crisis in modern times — or domestic political strains could erupt. 

Trade disputes

Political stress factors can get entangled with shifts in trade and other international policies. Independently of geopolitical developments, trade-related disputes could flare up. As the Commodity Special Feature highlights, the critical role of rare earth elements in global supply chains constitutes a particular point of friction. A re-evaluation of profit expectations regarding artificial intelligence (AI) or lowered expectations of viable markups stemming from more intense competition—even if productivity gains are realized— could lead to a decline in investment and trigger an abrupt correction in financial markets. Larger fiscal deficits and increasing public debt, starting from a position where fiscal buffers are already eroded, could put pressure on long-term interest rates and, in turn, on broader financial conditions. An erosion of institutions, including central bank independence and monetary policy credibility, could raise inflation expectations—especially at a time when headline inflation is increasing because of a shock in salient prices. On the upside, activity could be further lifted by AI-related investment and eventually transform into sustainable growth if faster AI adoption translates into strong productivity gains and increased business dynamism. Activity could also be supported by renewed momentum for structural reforms and by a sustained easing in trade tensions.  Navigating a profoundly changing economic and geopolitical landscape requires policies that are robust to alternative states of the world.  - TradeArabia News Service