French nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle
is seen in the Mediterranean port of Toulon.
West faces only high-cost options in Syria
Dubai, August 28, 2013
By Una Galani
Western powers readying to strike Syria must weigh the price of doing nothing against the likely negative impact from an intervention. The form of the military action will matter, but in this sectarian war, all options are fraught with risks.
The surgical strikes that are being contemplated would probably aim to undermine the regime's ability to deploy chemical weapons, rather than target the stockpiles themselves due to the obvious risk involved. The question is whether the West can avoid an escalation and a prolonged battle.
A limited approach is unlikely to change the on-the-ground dynamics of a two-year crisis where the death toll has already surpassed 100,000. The possibility it might bring the parties to some form of negotiating table is remote and the prominence of radical Islamist groups amongst the rebels isn't a good omen for what might follow sitting President Bashar al-Assad.
Intervention is likely to prove costly. Rebels who haven't been radicalised yet may be disappointed at the limited nature of the action, and could be hurt by possible civilian casualties.
Stock markets and currencies around the world have already tumbled amid fears that intervention will exacerbate regional sectarian tensions. Bomb attacks in Lebanon have intensified of late, and Iraq has seen its highest monthly death toll since 2008.
Retaliation by Syria and its powerful foreign backers would be costly.
Syria's conflict is hurting Jordan, where the fragile economy was already dependent on foreign aid before the flood of Syrian refugees.
Russia, which supplies 4 percent of Turkey's oil imports, could try to punish the country for its determined support of intervention. That would add further pressure on the battered lira. Hopes for a thaw in relations with Iran's new leadership may also wane. Furthermore, the flare-up of Sunni/Shi'ite tensions in the whole region would lead to lasting tensions on the oil market.
True, inaction would also have a price. The Syrian conflict may spill over to neighbouring countries even without outside military intervention, and ultimately lead to the same results.
Investors should brace for prolonged instability. Confronted with an unpleasant alternative, the US and its European allies must know that whatever they choose, they will have to face unpleasant consequences.
* The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
More Analysis, Interviews, Opinions Stories
- Arab Spring boosts demand for bulletproof cars
- Middle East leads drilling boom
- New engine, new rules and new sound for F1 in 2014
- Qatar rift a pivotal test for GCC
- Lufthansa to offer in-flight movies on smartphones
- Gulf's rift over Qatar may slow investment, reforms
- GCC insurance industry on a stable footing
- Turning charisma into cash: Bernanke's 40 minutes
- 'Healthy' role for private sector needed
- Riyadh, Jeddah among world’s cheapest cities
- US oil export ban could be lifted piecemeal
- Bill Gates with $76bn is world's richest again
- Mideast leads global luxury shopping spend
- ME firms facing ‘record level of cyber attack’
- Clubbing business with leisure and community work
- $27bn capital shortfall facing regional banks
- Obama, wary of foreign crises, faces new Ukraine test
- The brief reign of bitcoin's top exchange
- Iran's fleet back in business as exports pick up
- New food labels to combat obesity
- Dubai says has learned lessons from crisis
- Mt Gox bitcoin customers' money 'virtually gone'
- Now, Bond-style Smartphone from Boeing
- Top trends in workforce management for 2014
- Syrian exporters try to revive businesses
- Saudi spending potential narrowly based
- Obesity becoming the new norm in Europe
- Mobile privacy sells in post-Snowden world
- Morocco aims to quadruple farmland leases by 2020
- WhatsApp? No sign of Goldman Sachs